Table of contents
View more
Share with your friends
XFacebookLinkedInEmailRedditThreads
This article is part of the series Names and Their Biblical Meanings
What are the most common names for God used in the Bible?
The most common name for God in the Old Testament is Elohim. This name appears over 2,500 times. It is a plural form, yet used as a singular, perhaps hinting at the vastness and complexity of God’s nature. Elohim speaks of God’s power and majesty as Creator and Ruler of all.
Another frequently used name is Adonai, meaning “Lord” or “Master.” This name appears over 400 times and emphasizes God’s authority and our relationship to Him as servants. It reminds us of our dependence on God and His loving guidance in our lives.
YHWH, often rendered as Yahweh or Jehovah, is considered God’s personal name. It appears about 6,800 times in the Old Testament. This name, revealed to Moses at the burning bush, speaks of God’s eternal self-existence and His covenant relationship with His people.
In the New Testament, the most common name for God is Theos, the Greek word for “God.” It appears over 1,300 times. This name continues the Old Testament tradition of speaking of the one true God.
Jesus often referred to God as “Father” or “Abba,” an intimate Aramaic term similar to “Daddy.” This name reveals the close, loving relationship God desires with us. It appears about 170 times in the Gospels.
Other major names include El Shaddai (God Almighty), El Elyon (God Most High), and El Olam (The Everlasting God). Each of these names reveals a different aspect of God’s character and His relationship with us.
Psychologically these various names help us to form a more complete mental image of God. They allow us to relate to different aspects of the Divine in ways that resonate with our individual experiences and needs.
Historically, the use of multiple names for God reflects the development of Israel’s understanding of the Divine over time. It also shows the influence of different cultural and linguistic contexts on the expression of faith.
How many different names for God are there in Christianity?
When we consider the number of names for God in Christianity, we enter into a vast and beautiful mystery. The richness of God’s nature is reflected in the multitude of names used to describe Him throughout Scripture and Christian tradition.
While it is difficult to give an exact count, scholars have identified over 100 distinct names and titles for God in the Bible alone. Some studies suggest the number may be as high as 900 when including variations and combinations of names.
In the Old Testament, we find names like Elohim, YHWH, Adonai, El Shaddai, and many others. Each of these names reveals a different aspect of God’s character and His relationship with His people. The New Testament introduces us to names like Theos, Kyrios (Lord), and the intimate “Abba” used by Jesus.
Beyond the biblical names, Christian tradition has developed many other titles and descriptions for God. The Litany of the Holy Name of Jesus, for example, lists over 50 titles for Christ. Similarly, the Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary attributes many titles to God in relation to Mary’s role.
It’s important to understand, that this multiplicity of names is not about different gods, but about the many facets of the one true God. Like a diamond reflecting light in countless ways, these names help us glimpse the infinite nature of the Divine.
Psychologically this abundance of names serves an important purpose. It allows individuals to connect with God in ways that resonate with their personal experiences and needs. Someone seeking strength might relate to “God Almighty,” while someone in need of guidance might turn to “The Good Shepherd.”
Historically, the development of these names reflects the evolving understanding of God throughout the history of Israel and the Church. It also shows the influence of different cultures and languages on the expression of faith.
In our modern context, where many struggle to relate to traditional religious language, these varied names for God can provide multiple entry points for spiritual connection. They remind us that God is not limited to one mode of expression or relationship.
But we must be careful not to think we can fully capture or define God with these names. As St. Augustine wisely said, “If you have understood, then what you have understood is not God.” The names are invitations to relationship, not limitations on God’s nature.
In our diverse world, this multiplicity of names can also remind us of the many ways people of different faiths and cultures experience and express the Divine. It can inspire us to approach interfaith dialogue with humility and openness.
What do the various names of God reveal about His nature and attributes?
The names of God in Scripture are like windows into the Divine nature. Each name reveals a different aspect of God’s character, His relationship with us, and His role in the universe. Let us reflect on what these names teach us about our loving Creator.
The name Elohim, often translated simply as “God,” speaks of God’s power and majesty. It reminds us that God is the supreme Creator and Ruler of all things. This name can bring comfort in times of uncertainty, assuring us that the One who made the universe holds our lives in His hands.
YHWH, God’s personal name often rendered as Yahweh or Jehovah, carries powerful meaning. Revealed to Moses as “I AM WHO I AM,” this name speaks of God’s eternal self-existence and His faithfulness to His covenant promises. It reminds us that God is not a distant, impersonal force, but a Being who enters into relationship with His people.
Adonai, meaning “Lord” or “Master,” reveals God’s authority and our position as His servants. Yet this is not a harsh or oppressive mastery, but one of loving guidance and protection. It calls us to trust in God’s wisdom and direction for our lives.
El Shaddai, often translated as “God Almighty,” speaks of God’s power and ability to nourish and sustain. Like a mother nurturing her child, this name reveals God as the source of all we need for life and growth.
The name “Father,” so often used by Jesus, reveals the intimate, loving relationship God desires with each of us. It invites us to approach God with the trust and affection of a child coming to a loving parent.
Psychologically these varied names allow individuals to connect with different aspects of the Divine in ways that resonate with their personal needs and experiences. Someone facing challenges might find strength in “God Almighty,” while someone seeking guidance might turn to “The Good Shepherd.”
Historically, the development of these names reflects the deepening understanding of God’s nature throughout the history of Israel and the early Church. They show how God progressively revealed Himself to His people, adapting His self-revelation to their capacity to understand.
The names also reveal the balance in God’s nature. He is both transcendent (El Elyon, “God Most High”) and immanent (Immanuel, “God with us”). He is just (Elohim Mishpat, “God of Justice”) and merciful (El Rachum, “God of Compassion”).
In our modern context, where many struggle with the concept of God, these varied names can provide multiple ways to approach and understand the Divine. They remind us that God is not limited to one mode of being or relating, but is infinitely rich and complex.
But we must remember that Although these names reveal much about God, they do not exhaustively define Him. God always remains, in part, a mystery beyond our full comprehension. The names are invitations to relationship, not limitations on God’s nature.
What is the significance of God’s personal name YHWH (Yahweh)?
The name YHWH, often pronounced as Yahweh, holds a special place in our understanding of God. This name, revealed to Moses at the burning bush, carries powerful significance for our faith and our relationship with the Divine.
YHWH is considered God’s personal name. Unlike titles such as Elohim or Adonai, YHWH is the name by which God identifies Himself. When Moses asked God’s name, He replied, “I AM WHO I AM.” This name speaks of God’s eternal self-existence, His unchanging nature, and His absolute reliability.
The significance of this name is multi-faceted. it reveals God as a personal Being, not an impersonal force. By giving His name, God invites us into a personal relationship with Him. This is a powerful truth that sets our faith apart from many philosophical concepts of deity.
The meaning of the name – “I AM WHO I AM” – speaks of God’s absolute independence and self-sufficiency. It tells us that God’s existence is not contingent on anything or anyone else. He is the source of all being, the uncreated Creator.
YHWH is closely associated with God’s covenant relationship with His people. It is the name by which He chose to be known to Israel, marking a new stage in salvation history. This name reminds us of God’s faithfulness to His promises.
Psychologically the concept of God having a personal name can profoundly impact how we relate to Him. It makes the Divine more approachable, more relatable. Yet the mysterious nature of the name also preserves a sense of God’s transcendence.
Historically, the revelation of this name marked a major development in the Israelites’ understanding of God. It moved them beyond the polytheistic concepts of their neighbors to a unique monotheism centered on a personal, covenant-making God.
The Jewish people, out of reverence, eventually ceased to pronounce this name aloud, substituting Adonai (Lord) when reading Scripture. This practice reminds us of the holiness and mystery that surrounds God’s very being.
In Christian tradition, Although we acknowledge the significance of YHWH, we also see it as pointing forward to Jesus, who made statements like “Before Abraham was, I AM.” In this way, the name connects the God of the Old Testament with the Incarnate Christ.
The name YHWH also has ethical implications. If God is the “I AM,” the source of all being, then our own existence and identity are grounded in Him. This calls us to live in a way that reflects His character.
In our modern context, where many feel adrift and searching for identity, the name YHWH reminds us that there is an unchanging, eternal Being who gives meaning and purpose to existence. It offers an anchor in a world of flux.
But we must be careful not to think we can fully grasp or control God by knowing His name. The name YHWH is an invitation to relationship, not a magical formula. It calls us to approach God with both intimacy and reverence.
How do Catholics and Protestants differ in their use of names for God?
While Catholics and Protestants share a common faith in the one true God, there are some differences in how they approach and use the names of God. These differences reflect the distinct traditions and emphases that have developed within these branches of Christianity.
In Catholic tradition, there is a rich use of titles and honorifics for God, often reflecting the Church’s long history and liturgical practices. Catholics frequently use terms like “The Almighty,” “The Most High,” and “The Blessed Trinity.” The Litany of the Holy Name of Jesus, a traditional Catholic prayer, lists over 50 titles for Christ.
Catholics also have a tradition of using titles that reflect Mary’s relationship with God, such as “Mother of God” (Theotokos). Although these are primarily titles for Mary, they also say something about how Catholics understand God’s nature and His relationship with humanity.
Protestants, influenced by the Reformation’s emphasis on Scripture alone (sola scriptura), tend to focus more on the names for God found directly in the Bible. They may be more likely to use names like Yahweh, Elohim, or Adonai in their personal devotions or teachings.
Both traditions use “Father” as a primary way of addressing God, following Jesus’ example. But some Protestant denominations, particularly those influenced by the charismatic movement, may use more intimate forms like “Daddy” or “Papa,” based on Jesus’ use of “Abba.”
Psychologically these differences can reflect and reinforce different ways of relating to the Divine. The Catholic use of formal titles may foster a sense of reverence and transcendence, Although the Protestant emphasis on biblical names may encourage a more direct, personal relationship.
Historically, these differences have roots in the Reformation. Protestants, reacting against what they saw as excessive veneration of saints and Mary, sought to focus more directly on God as revealed in Scripture. Catholics, on the other hand, maintained their rich tradition of titles and invocations.
In terms of liturgy, Catholics tend to use more formal language when addressing God in public worship, often using Latin terms like “Dominus” (Lord) or “Deus” (God). Protestant services, especially in non-liturgical churches, may use more varied and informal language.
Both traditions affirm the importance of the name “Jesus Christ,” but may emphasize different aspects. Catholics often use “Christ” as a title (“Jesus the Christ”), while in some Protestant contexts it’s used more as a surname.
These are general trends, and there is much variation within both Catholic and Protestant traditions. Many Catholics embrace biblical names in their personal devotions, and many Protestants appreciate the richness of traditional titles for God.
In our modern context, where ecumenical dialogue is increasingly important, understanding these differences can help foster mutual respect and understanding between Catholics and Protestants. It reminds us that Although we may express our faith in different ways, we worship the same God.
But we must be careful not to let these differences become sources of division. The various names and titles for God, whether from Catholic or Protestant traditions, all seek to express the inexpressible – the nature of the infinite, eternal God.
What are some unique or lesser-known names for God in Christianity?
One such name is “El Roi,” meaning “the God who sees.” We find this name in Genesis, spoken by Hagar when God comforts her in the wilderness. It reminds us that God sees our struggles and cares for the outcast.
Another beautiful name is “Jehovah Rapha,” which means “the Lord who heals.” This name appears in Exodus after God makes bitter waters sweet for the Israelites. It speaks to God’s power to heal both body and soul.
The name “Ancient of Days” comes from the book of Daniel. It portrays God as eternally wise and sovereign over all of history. This name inspires awe at God’s transcendence.
“Abba” is an Aramaic word meaning “father,” but with the intimacy of “daddy.” Jesus used this name in prayer, revealing the close relationship we can have with God.
The title “Bread of Life” comes from Jesus’ own words in John’s Gospel. It shows how God nourishes our spiritual hunger.
“Wonderful Counselor” is one of the names Isaiah gives to the coming Messiah. It speaks of God’s wisdom and guidance in our lives.
“Lion of Judah” appears in Revelation, depicting Christ’s strength and royal lineage.
“Bright Morning Star” is another name from Revelation, symbolizing hope and Christ’s triumph over darkness.
“El Elyon” means “God Most High,” emphasizing God’s supremacy over all other powers.
“Immanuel,” meaning “God with us,” reminds us of God’s constant presence.
These names reveal different facets of God’s nature. They show God as protector, healer, eternal, intimate, nourisher, wise guide, powerful, hopeful, supreme, and ever-present. Each name invites us to know God more deeply.
As we ponder these names, let us remember that they are not mere titles. They are invitations to experience God’s character. When we feel unseen, we can call on El Roi. When we need healing, we turn to Jehovah Rapha. In our weakness, we find strength in the Lion of Judah.
These names also challenge us. If God is the Wonderful Counselor, do we seek His wisdom? If He is Immanuel, do we live aware of His presence? Let these names shape our understanding of God and our response to Him.
How should Christians use God’s names in prayer and worship?
The names of God are not simply words, but gateways to deeper communion with our Creator. How we use these names in prayer and worship can profoundly impact our spiritual lives.
We must approach God’s names with reverence. Each name reveals an aspect of God’s character. When we use these names thoughtfully, we acknowledge God’s greatness. This attitude of reverence prepares our hearts for genuine worship.
In prayer, using God’s names can guide our petitions. If we pray to Jehovah Jireh, “the Lord will provide,” we express faith in God’s provision. Calling on El Shaddai, “God Almighty,” reminds us of God’s power to handle any situation we face.
God’s names can also shape our praise. When we worship God as “King of Kings,” we celebrate His sovereignty. Praising “The Good Shepherd” expresses gratitude for God’s tender care.
Using various names of God in prayer helps us see Him more fully. It guards against a one-dimensional view of God. We come to know God as both just and merciful, transcendent and immanent.
The names of God can bring comfort in difficult times. Praying to “The God of All Comfort” reminds us of God’s compassion. Calling on “The Rock” reinforces God’s stability when our world feels shaken.
In corporate worship, using God’s names unites the congregation in a shared understanding of who God is. It educates newer believers and deepens the faith of mature ones.
But we must be careful not to use God’s names superstitiously. They are not magic words to manipulate God. Rather, they are invitations to know God more intimately.
We should also strive to understand the meanings behind the names we use. This prevents empty repetition and fosters sincere worship.
In our personal devotions, meditating on a specific name of God can be enriching. It allows us to explore different aspects of God’s nature and how they relate to our lives.
As we pray, we can let God’s names inspire our own prayers. “Abba, Father” encourages us to pray with childlike trust. “Judge of All the Earth” prompts us to pray for justice.
Remember, Jesus taught us to pray “Our Father.” This reminds us that while God has many names, He desires a personal relationship with us.
Using God’s names in prayer and worship should draw us closer to Him. It should deepen our understanding, strengthen our faith, and increase our love for God.
What did the early Church Fathers teach about the names of God?
Many Church Fathers saw God’s names as revelations of divine nature. Origen, for instance, taught that each name of God in Scripture revealed a specific attribute or action of God. He encouraged believers to meditate on these names to grow in knowledge of God.
Justin Martyr emphasized that God’s true name was unknowable. He believed the names in Scripture were human attempts to describe God’s actions or character. This view highlighted God’s transcendence.
Clement of Alexandria taught that God was beyond all names. Yet he also recognized the value of the names given in Scripture. He saw them as stepping stones to contemplation of the divine.
Tertullian stressed the importance of using the names God revealed in Scripture. He was cautious about philosophical speculations about God’s nature beyond these revealed names.
The Cappadocian Fathers – Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus – developed a nuanced understanding of God’s names. They taught that while God’s essence was unknowable, His energies or actions could be named.
Augustine wrote extensively on the names of God. He saw them as accommodations to human understanding. Augustine taught that no single name could fully capture God’s nature.
John of Damascus compiled a list of names for God from Scripture. He emphasized that these names revealed real truths about God, even if they couldn’t exhaust God’s nature.
Many Church Fathers were particularly interested in the name “I AM” revealed to Moses. They saw this as a powerful statement of God’s self-existence and eternity.
The name “Father” was especially major in early Christian thought. It was seen as Christ’s unique revelation, inviting believers into an intimate relationship with God.
Some Church Fathers, like Pseudo-Dionysius, developed the idea of negative theology. This approach emphasized what God is not, recognizing the limitations of human language to describe God.
They taught that the proper use of God’s names should lead to humility and wonder, not presumption. The names were seen as invitations to know God, not comprehensive definitions of God.
The Fathers also emphasized the importance of living in light of God’s names. Knowing God as “Holy” should lead to holy living. Understanding God as “Love” should inspire us to love others.
In their writings, we see a balance between affirming the value of God’s revealed names and maintaining a sense of divine mystery. This balance can guide our own approach to God’s names.
Are there any names for God that are considered sacred or not to be spoken?
In our journey of faith, we encounter names for God that carry special weight. Some are considered so sacred that traditions have arisen around their use. Let us explore this with humility and respect.
In the Jewish tradition, from which Christianity springs, the name YHWH (often rendered as Yahweh) is considered most sacred. This name, revealed to Moses at the burning bush, was traditionally not pronounced. Instead, Jews would say “Adonai” (Lord) when reading Scripture.
This practice influenced early Christian use of divine names. Many early Christians adopted the Jewish reverence for the divine name. This is why many Bible translations use “LORD” in all capitals where YHWH appears in the Hebrew text.
The commandment against taking God’s name in vain has led to careful use of divine names in many Christian traditions. This isn’t just about avoiding profanity. It’s about treating God’s name with utmost respect.
In some Orthodox traditions, the Jesus Prayer (“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner”) is considered very sacred. While not forbidden to speak, it’s treated with great reverence.
The name “I AM” is another name treated with special reverence. When Jesus used this name for himself, it was considered blasphemy by the religious leaders of his time. This shows the power associated with this name.
In some Christian mystical traditions, there’s a concept of an “unutterable name” of God. This reflects the belief that God’s true nature is beyond human comprehension or expression.
The practice of using euphemisms for God’s name, like “the Almighty” or “the Holy One,” stems partly from this sense of reverence. It’s a way of acknowledging God while maintaining a respectful distance.
In some traditions, names of God are written in special ways. For example, some write “G-d” instead of “God” out of reverence. This practice reminds us that no written word can fully capture God’s nature.
Christianity generally doesn’t forbid speaking God’s names. Rather, it encourages using them with reverence. Jesus taught us to pray “Our Father,” inviting us into intimate relationship with God.
The sacredness of God’s names in Christianity is more about attitude than strict rules. It’s about approaching God with awe and respect, recognizing His holiness.
In the liturgy of many churches, certain names of God are reserved for specific, solemn moments. This highlights their special significance.
The name “Jesus” holds a unique place in Christian devotion. While not forbidden to speak, many treat it with special reverence. Some bow their heads when saying or hearing this name.
All names for God in Christianity are considered sacred. The issue is not whether they can be spoken, but how they are spoken. Are they used with reverence and love, or carelessly?
This reverence for divine names reminds us of God’s transcendence. Yet Christianity also emphasizes God’s immanence. We’re invited to call God “Abba,” an intimate term.
How do the names for God in Christianity compare to those in other religions?
In Islam, Allah is the primary name for God. This name is similar to the Hebrew Elohim. Both emphasize God’s supremacy and uniqueness. Muslims also use 99 “beautiful names” for God, many of which resonate with Christian understandings.
Hinduism presents a different perspective. It speaks of one ultimate reality, Brahman, but also of many gods with distinct names and attributes. This contrasts with Christianity’s monotheistic view, yet there are parallels in how divine attributes are expressed.
Buddhism, in its original form, doesn’t focus on naming a supreme deity. But some Buddhist traditions have developed names for transcendent beings. This reminds us that not all religions center on a personal God as Christianity does.
In Judaism, the names for God closely relate to those in Christianity. The Tetragrammaton (YHWH) is central, as are names like Elohim and Adonai. Christianity builds on this foundation, adding names revealed in the New Testament.
Sikhism uses names like Waheguru (“Wonderful Teacher”) for God. This emphasizes God’s role as a guide, similar to Christian names like “Wonderful Counselor.”
Zoroastrianism names God as Ahura Mazda, meaning “Wise Lord.” This echoes Christian emphases on God’s wisdom and lordship.
Native American spiritualities often use names connecting deity to nature, like “Great Spirit.” While different from typical Christian names, this resonates with Christian views of God as Creator.
Ancient Egyptian religion had many names for deities. The concept of hidden divine names held power, somewhat similar to Jewish traditions around YHWH.
In Taoism, the Tao is often unnamed, being beyond human categories. This has some parallels with Christian apophatic theology, which speaks of what God is not.
Confucianism traditionally speaks of “Heaven” rather than a personal deity. This differs from Christianity’s personal God, yet there are some functional similarities.
Comparing these traditions, we see both differences and commonalities. Many religions recognize divine attributes like wisdom, power, and love. The ways these are expressed vary.
Christianity uniquely emphasizes God as Trinity – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This relational understanding of God is distinct among world religions.
The Christian use of “Father” for God, while not unique, takes on special significance due to Jesus’ teachings. It implies a personal, caring relationship with deity.
Names for God in many religions reflect cultural and historical contexts. This is true in Christianity too, reminding us that our understanding of God is always shaped by our human perspective.
Some religions, like Christianity, see divine names as revealed by God. Others view them more as human attempts to describe the divine. This affects how the names are used and understood.
The variety of names across religions reminds us of the human quest to understand the divine. It should inspire humility in our own theological claims.
At the same time, the uniqueness of Christian names for God, especially those revealed by Jesus, affirms our faith tradition. We believe God has made Himself known in a special way through Christ.
Let this comparison deepen our appreciation for our own faith while fostering respect for others. May it remind us that Although we believe we know God truly through Christ, God’s full nature remains a beautiful mystery that transcends all human naming.
Share with your friends
XFacebookLinkedInEmailRedditThreads
Alici, M. (2011). The Idea of God in Ancient Turkish Religion according to Raffaele Pettazzoni A Comparison with the Turkish Historian of Religions Hikmet Tanyu. 77, 137–154.
Beekers, D. (2017). Fitting God in Secular Routines, Prayer, and Deceleration among Young Dutch Muslims and Christians. 72–89.
Boer, D., & Erik, A. (2011). Augustine’s early discovery of the doctrine of God’s dlection and the tale of his conversion in the Confessiones.
Book Reviews: John Koenig, Charismata: God’s Gifts for God’s People. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1978. Pp. 213. Pb., $4.95. (n.d.).
Bruening, A. D., & Paulsen, D. L. (2001). The Development of the Mormon Understanding of God: Early Mormon Modalism and Other Myths. The FARMS Review of Books.
Christian, E. (2000). Prophets Under God’s Authority: Headcoverings in 1 Corinthians 11:1-16. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 10, 20.
Foster, P. (2007). Book Review: NEW HISTORY OF THE CRUSADES Christopher Tyerman, God’s War: A New History of the Crusades (London: Penguin Allen, 2006. £30.00. pp. xvi + 1024. ISBN 0—674—02387—0). The Expository Times, 118, 562–563.
Gökbel, A. R. (2020). Hare, John, God’s Command, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. İslâm Araştırmaları Dergisi.
Hinson, G. (1966). Book Review: II. Historical—Theological Studies: God and World in Early Christian Theology: A Study in Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen. Review & Expositor, 63, 219–219.
Hwang, J. (2013). Book Review: Disruptive Grace: Reflections on God, Scripture, and the Church. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 43, 174–175.
Ion, H. (2016). Christianity and Imperialism in Modern Japan: Empire for God by Emily Anderson (review). Monumenta Nipponica, 71, 206–211.
Jung, K. I. (2022). Dialogue and Self-Confrontation: A Study of Ahn Byung-Mu’s Minjung Theology of Religions. The Korean Society of Minjung Theology.
Kaufman, D., & Griffith, R. (1997). God’s Daughters: Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission.
Kim, M. (2015). Ruth A.Meyers, Missional Worship, Worshipful Mission: Gathering as God’s People Going Out in God’s Name. (Calvin Institute of Christian Worship Liturgical Studies). Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2014, Xiv + 242 pp. International Review of Mission, 104, 422–426.
Kirabaev, N., & Chistyakova, O. (2020). Knowing God in Eastern Christianity and Islamic Tradition: A Comparative Study. Religions.
Ladas, A. (2023). Gregory Palamas’ Reading of a Seventh-Century Pseudo-Athanasian Homily. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa.
Macgaffey, W. (2022). Precolonial Beliefs in God, Nzambi, and Chthonic Beings: Evidence from Kongo Texts. Journal of Religion in Africa.
Mai-bornu, Z. (2023). Rage and carnage in the name of God: religious violence in Nigeria. Religion, State and Society, 51, 302–304.
Morris, J. (2008). The Response of The Early Church to Gnosticism. 47–63.
Petersen, W. H. (2015). Missional Worship, Worshipful Mission: Gathering as God’s People, Going out in God’s Name. Anglican Theological Review, 97, 724.
Rea, M. (2020). Protest, Worship, and the Deformation of Prayer. 193–210.
Redondo, J. C. T. (2007). The many names of God: christianity in hispanic caribbean science fiction.
Regule, T. (2016). Iconic Encounter: Seeing and Being Seen by God’s Word. Liturgy, 31, 26–33.
Rendlová, K. (2014). Divine Beauty Reflected: Comparison of Aesthetics of Church and Mosque with Special Regard to Conceptions of Christianity and Islam.
Rodov, I. M. (2017). 11 Hallucination Depicted: God’s Name on Shiviti Plates. 238–274.
Shannonhouse, L. R., Dosal-Terminel, D., Kwag, D., Hall, M. E. L., Park, C. L., McMartin, J., Silverman, E. J., Aten, J., O’Connor, M. H., & Kapic, K. (2023). “God was with me”: A qualitative study of Christian meaning-making among refugees. Journal of Traumatic Stress.
Stead, C. (1986). Saints and Sinners in the Early Church. By W. H. C. Frend. Pp. 183. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1985. £4.50. 0 232 51663 4. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 37, 484–484.
Sutcliffe, R. (2024). Blessed Victors.
Tierney, B. (1992). A Hound of God. Pierre de la Palud and the fourteenth-century church . By Dunbabin Jean. Pp. xi + 211. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. £27.50. 0 19 822291 2. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 43, 149–149.
Toews, T. W. (2011). Biblical Sources in the Development of the Concept of the Soul in the Writings of the Fathers of the Early Christian church, 100-325 C.E. 50, 36.
Vokes, F. E. (1973). Book Review: EDWIN HATCH AND EARLY CHURCH ORDER. By Norman F. Josaitis (Recherches et Syntheses, Section d’Histoire, III) Editions J. Duculot, S.A., Gembloux; Pp, xxvi + 134. Price 300 FB. Irish Theological Quarterly, 40, 287–289.
Willis, G. (1972). God’s Altar on High. The Downside Review, 90, 245–250.
Ვაშალომიძე. (2024). ნათლისღების იკონოგრაფია და მისი საღვთისმეტყველო – სახისმეტყველებითი ასპექტები. Sjani.
Ayers, P. W. (2016). Book Review: The Rebirthing of God: Christianity’s Struggle for New Beginnings. Anglican Theological Review, 98, 791–793.
Băcilă, F.-M. (2022). Proper names and the configuration of intimacy with the Divine in Traian Dorz’s poetry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Onomastics “Name and Naming”.
Bellver, J. (2014). Mirroring the Islamic Tradition of the Names of God in Christianity: Ramon Llull’s Cent Noms de Déu 287–304.
Byrne, M. (2011). The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: A Basis for Interfaith Dialogue.
Byrne, Máire.The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: Continuum, 2011. xi+171 pp. $34.95 (paper). (n.d.).
Christ, J. (2019). Grade 11 – Abeka Detailed Christian School Scope and Sequence 2019-2020.
Cornell, C. (2019). Names of God in the Hebrew Bible. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion.
Croy. (2014). A God by Any Other Name: Polyonymy in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Early Christianity. Bulletin for Biblical Research.
Divsalar, F., & Mazhari, M. S. (2013). Glorifications of Names and attributes of God in Persian Poems.
Donlan, T. C. (2017). The Beauty of God. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 10, 185–225.
Griffiths, J. (1964). Book Review: L’Expression de la Louange Divine et de la Prière Dans la Bible et en Égypte. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 50, 189–191.
Hedges, P. (2012). Máire Byrne: The Names of God in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: A Basis for Interfaith Dialogue. London: Continuum, 2011; pp. xi + 171. Journal of Religious History, 36, 622–623.
Houtepen, A. (2007). 2. The Dialectics Of The Icon: A Reference To God? 49–73.
Ikotun, R. O., & Aládésanmí, O. A. (2012). Surname Change among Some Yorùbá Christians. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3, 903–908.
Ion, H. (2016). Christianity and Imperialism in Modern Japan: Empire for God by Emily Anderson (review). Monumenta Nipponica, 71, 206–211.
Krašovec, J. (2004). Transliteration or Translation of Biblical Proper Names. Translation Review, 67, 41–57.
Krašovec, J. (2015). General and Proper Names for God ( s ) in the Hebrew Bible.
Longhurst, C. (2013). Tawhid and Homoousios: Narrowing the Gaps between Muslim and Christian Understanding of God’s Divine Oneness. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 48, 255.
Lubis, D., Aziz, N., Sinaga, A. I., Sikumbang, A. T., Yamamah, A., Ridwan, M., Suharyanto, A., Bahri, S., & Saragih, M. (2020). An Eschatological Study of Jerusalem in Biblical and Quranic Literature. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 29, 217–235.
Mawson, T. J. (2024). On Worshipping the Same God. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Mccloskey, H. (1974). God and Evil.
Mosavi, A., & Khaleghzadeh, M. H. (2016). Manifestation of the divine names and attributes in the poems of Tahereh Saffarzadeh. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1371–1380.
Rahimi, L. (2013). A Study of the Principles of Positive Islamic Mysticism.
Randall, & Chesnutt, D. (2003). Revelatory Experiences Attributed to Biblical Women in Early Jewish Literature.
Redondo, J. C. T. (2007). The many names of God: christianity in hispanic caribbean science fiction.
Reynolds, S. (2013). “I AM has sent me to you:” How Thomas Aquinas’ understanding of the divine names illuminates the way in which he reconciles impassibility and compassion in God. Lumen et Vita.
Richardson, B. T. (2019). Are We Speaking the Same Language? The Influence of Scripture Translations on How Christians and Muslims Talk about God. The Bible Translator, 70, 16–34.
Sasson, G. E. (2015). The Symbolic Meaning of Biblical Names as a Narrative Tool: Moses, Abraham, and David. Storytelling, Self, Society, 11, 298.
Tabar, S. Z., Elmi, G., & Nazari, J. S. (2016). Interpretation of Divine Attributes with regard to Mulla Sadrā’s View. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1, 1111–1127.
THE NATURAL BASIS OF OUR SPIRITUAL LANGUAGE.l. (2010).
Todd, R. (2016). Universality in Islamic Thought: Rationalism, Science and Religious Belief. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 27, 535–538.
Triguna, I. (2018). KONSEP KETUHANAN DAN KEMANUSIAAN DALAM HINDU. 18, 71–83.
Turro, J. (1963). Book Review: The Birth of the New Testament. Theological Studies, 24, 125–127.
Verjani, H. S., & Tajari, A. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of the Notions of God, Prophet and Holy Book in Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Hinduism. 26.
Wingert, M. (2017). The “God of the Fathers” and Self-Identification in the Hebrew Bible.
Zou, X. (2010). Christianity to Me: Approaching God in Love. Canadian Social Science, 3, 86–91.
Ненарокова, М. Р. (2024). God the Creator and man the creator: Auctor – Creator – Conditor. Dialog so Vremenem.